Review



rabbit anti higa antibody  (Biosynth Carbosynth)


Bioz Verified Symbol Biosynth Carbosynth is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Biosynth Carbosynth manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    Biosynth Carbosynth rabbit anti higa antibody
    FIG. 5. Recombinant <t>HigA</t> protein directly and specifically binds to the higB P2 promoter. Protein-DNA binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein and the 68-bp 32P-labeled higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol) using increasing amounts of protein (A), unlabeled higB P2 promoter fragment (identical to the probe) as <t>specific</t> <t>competitor</t> (B), unlabeled higB P1 promoter fragment as nonspecific competitor (C), and anti-HigA antibody (D). The concentrations of recombinant protein used were 3.5, 7, 14, and 28 M for lanes 2 to 5, respectively, 0 M for lanes 1 and 17, and 56 M for all other lanes. Competitor DNA fragments were added in 5-, 10-, 100-, and 200-fold molar excess of the labeled probe (lanes 8 to 11 and 13 to 16). Anti-HigA antibody was used at final dilutions of 1 in 5,000, 500, 50, and 5 for lanes 19 to 22, respectively.
    Rabbit Anti Higa Antibody, supplied by Biosynth Carbosynth, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 8 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+higa+antibody/10__1128_slash_jb__00454___10-121-13-20?v=Biosynth+Carbosynth
    Average 90 stars, based on 8 article reviews
    rabbit anti higa antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Analyzing the Regulatory Role of the HigA Antitoxin within Mycobacterium tuberculosis"

    Article Title: Analyzing the Regulatory Role of the HigA Antitoxin within Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    Journal: Journal of Bacteriology

    doi: 10.1128/jb.00454-10

    FIG. 5. Recombinant HigA protein directly and specifically binds to the higB P2 promoter. Protein-DNA binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein and the 68-bp 32P-labeled higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol) using increasing amounts of protein (A), unlabeled higB P2 promoter fragment (identical to the probe) as specific competitor (B), unlabeled higB P1 promoter fragment as nonspecific competitor (C), and anti-HigA antibody (D). The concentrations of recombinant protein used were 3.5, 7, 14, and 28 M for lanes 2 to 5, respectively, 0 M for lanes 1 and 17, and 56 M for all other lanes. Competitor DNA fragments were added in 5-, 10-, 100-, and 200-fold molar excess of the labeled probe (lanes 8 to 11 and 13 to 16). Anti-HigA antibody was used at final dilutions of 1 in 5,000, 500, 50, and 5 for lanes 19 to 22, respectively.
    Figure Legend Snippet: FIG. 5. Recombinant HigA protein directly and specifically binds to the higB P2 promoter. Protein-DNA binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein and the 68-bp 32P-labeled higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol) using increasing amounts of protein (A), unlabeled higB P2 promoter fragment (identical to the probe) as specific competitor (B), unlabeled higB P1 promoter fragment as nonspecific competitor (C), and anti-HigA antibody (D). The concentrations of recombinant protein used were 3.5, 7, 14, and 28 M for lanes 2 to 5, respectively, 0 M for lanes 1 and 17, and 56 M for all other lanes. Competitor DNA fragments were added in 5-, 10-, 100-, and 200-fold molar excess of the labeled probe (lanes 8 to 11 and 13 to 16). Anti-HigA antibody was used at final dilutions of 1 in 5,000, 500, 50, and 5 for lanes 19 to 22, respectively.

    Techniques Used: Recombinant, Binding Assay, Labeling

    FIG. 6. Identification of the HigA DNA-binding motif and the effect of mutating this motif on HigA binding and higB P2 promoter activity. (A) The wild-type and mutated sequences of the 68-bp higB P2 promoter fragment. The experimentally determined P2 promoter transcriptional start site (45) and putative 10 and 35 sequences are in boldface and boxed, respectively. The identified perfect palindromic DNA motif is underlined, with mutated bases highlighted in gray. (B) DNA-binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein (0 and 56 M for lanes marked and , respectively) and the 32P-labeled mutated higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol). (C) Protein-DNA-binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein (56 M) and the 32P-labeled wild-type higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol) using increasing amounts of unlabeled mutated higB P2 promoter fragment as competitor (5-, 10-, 100-, and 200-fold molar excess of the labeled probe for lanes 2 to 5, respectively). (D) -Gal assays were performed on cell-free protein extracts of wild-type M. tuberculosis H37Rv and the higB-Rv1957 deletion strain containing the promoter-lacZ fusion plasmids pASF32 (wild-type higB P2 promoter) and pASF58 (mutated higB P2 promoter) alongside the empty vector control (pEJ414). The data presented are averages of the results for three biological replicates, each assayed in duplicate, and error bars represent standard deviations. The -Gal activity level for the higB-Rv1957 deletion strain containing pASF32 was significantly higher than the equivalent wild-type-strain level (, P 0.05; Student’s t test). The -Gal activity level for the higB-Rv1957 deletion strain containing pASF58 was not significantly different from the equivalent wild-type-strain level (P 0.05; Student’s t test).
    Figure Legend Snippet: FIG. 6. Identification of the HigA DNA-binding motif and the effect of mutating this motif on HigA binding and higB P2 promoter activity. (A) The wild-type and mutated sequences of the 68-bp higB P2 promoter fragment. The experimentally determined P2 promoter transcriptional start site (45) and putative 10 and 35 sequences are in boldface and boxed, respectively. The identified perfect palindromic DNA motif is underlined, with mutated bases highlighted in gray. (B) DNA-binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein (0 and 56 M for lanes marked and , respectively) and the 32P-labeled mutated higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol). (C) Protein-DNA-binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein (56 M) and the 32P-labeled wild-type higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol) using increasing amounts of unlabeled mutated higB P2 promoter fragment as competitor (5-, 10-, 100-, and 200-fold molar excess of the labeled probe for lanes 2 to 5, respectively). (D) -Gal assays were performed on cell-free protein extracts of wild-type M. tuberculosis H37Rv and the higB-Rv1957 deletion strain containing the promoter-lacZ fusion plasmids pASF32 (wild-type higB P2 promoter) and pASF58 (mutated higB P2 promoter) alongside the empty vector control (pEJ414). The data presented are averages of the results for three biological replicates, each assayed in duplicate, and error bars represent standard deviations. The -Gal activity level for the higB-Rv1957 deletion strain containing pASF32 was significantly higher than the equivalent wild-type-strain level (, P 0.05; Student’s t test). The -Gal activity level for the higB-Rv1957 deletion strain containing pASF58 was not significantly different from the equivalent wild-type-strain level (P 0.05; Student’s t test).

    Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Activity Assay, Labeling, Plasmid Preparation, Control

    FIG. 7. HigA does not bind to the next-most-closely related motif within the genome. (A) Sequence of the 68-bp fragment containing the DNA motif (underlined) between whiB5 and Rv0023, with the two bases mismatched to the HigA DNA-binding motif highlighted in gray. (B) Protein- DNA binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein (0 and 56 M for lanes marked and , respectively) and the 32P-labeled whiB5-Rv0023 probe (23 fmol). (C) Protein-DNA-binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein (56 M) and the 32P-labeled wild-type higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol) using increasing amounts of unlabeled whiB5-Rv0023 fragment as competitor (5-, 10-, 100-, and 200-fold molar excess of the labeled probe for lanes 2 to 5, respectively).
    Figure Legend Snippet: FIG. 7. HigA does not bind to the next-most-closely related motif within the genome. (A) Sequence of the 68-bp fragment containing the DNA motif (underlined) between whiB5 and Rv0023, with the two bases mismatched to the HigA DNA-binding motif highlighted in gray. (B) Protein- DNA binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein (0 and 56 M for lanes marked and , respectively) and the 32P-labeled whiB5-Rv0023 probe (23 fmol). (C) Protein-DNA-binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein (56 M) and the 32P-labeled wild-type higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol) using increasing amounts of unlabeled whiB5-Rv0023 fragment as competitor (5-, 10-, 100-, and 200-fold molar excess of the labeled probe for lanes 2 to 5, respectively).

    Techniques Used: Sequencing, Binding Assay, Labeling



    Similar Products

    95
    Bethyl goat anti higa antibody hrp conjugated
    Goat Anti Higa Antibody Hrp Conjugated, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+higa+antibody/pmc08072762-44-9-14?v=Bethyl
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    goat anti higa antibody hrp conjugated - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Jackson Immuno rabbit anti higa fc alexa fluor 647
    Rabbit Anti Higa Fc Alexa Fluor 647, supplied by Jackson Immuno, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+higa+antibody/pmc07901184-124-46-51?v=Jackson+Immuno
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti higa fc alexa fluor 647 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Biosynth Carbosynth rabbit anti higa antibody
    FIG. 5. Recombinant <t>HigA</t> protein directly and specifically binds to the higB P2 promoter. Protein-DNA binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein and the 68-bp 32P-labeled higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol) using increasing amounts of protein (A), unlabeled higB P2 promoter fragment (identical to the probe) as <t>specific</t> <t>competitor</t> (B), unlabeled higB P1 promoter fragment as nonspecific competitor (C), and anti-HigA antibody (D). The concentrations of recombinant protein used were 3.5, 7, 14, and 28 M for lanes 2 to 5, respectively, 0 M for lanes 1 and 17, and 56 M for all other lanes. Competitor DNA fragments were added in 5-, 10-, 100-, and 200-fold molar excess of the labeled probe (lanes 8 to 11 and 13 to 16). Anti-HigA antibody was used at final dilutions of 1 in 5,000, 500, 50, and 5 for lanes 19 to 22, respectively.
    Rabbit Anti Higa Antibody, supplied by Biosynth Carbosynth, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+higa+antibody/10__1128_slash_jb__00454___10-121-13-20?v=Biosynth+Carbosynth
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti higa antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Agilent technologies rabbit antihigg, anti-higm anti-higa antibodies
    FIG. 5. Recombinant <t>HigA</t> protein directly and specifically binds to the higB P2 promoter. Protein-DNA binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein and the 68-bp 32P-labeled higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol) using increasing amounts of protein (A), unlabeled higB P2 promoter fragment (identical to the probe) as <t>specific</t> <t>competitor</t> (B), unlabeled higB P1 promoter fragment as nonspecific competitor (C), and anti-HigA antibody (D). The concentrations of recombinant protein used were 3.5, 7, 14, and 28 M for lanes 2 to 5, respectively, 0 M for lanes 1 and 17, and 56 M for all other lanes. Competitor DNA fragments were added in 5-, 10-, 100-, and 200-fold molar excess of the labeled probe (lanes 8 to 11 and 13 to 16). Anti-HigA antibody was used at final dilutions of 1 in 5,000, 500, 50, and 5 for lanes 19 to 22, respectively.
    Rabbit Antihigg, Anti Higm Anti Higa Antibodies, supplied by Agilent technologies, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+higa+antibody/pm18029377-63-13-17?v=Agilent+technologies
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit antihigg, anti-higm anti-higa antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    FIG. 5. Recombinant HigA protein directly and specifically binds to the higB P2 promoter. Protein-DNA binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein and the 68-bp 32P-labeled higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol) using increasing amounts of protein (A), unlabeled higB P2 promoter fragment (identical to the probe) as specific competitor (B), unlabeled higB P1 promoter fragment as nonspecific competitor (C), and anti-HigA antibody (D). The concentrations of recombinant protein used were 3.5, 7, 14, and 28 M for lanes 2 to 5, respectively, 0 M for lanes 1 and 17, and 56 M for all other lanes. Competitor DNA fragments were added in 5-, 10-, 100-, and 200-fold molar excess of the labeled probe (lanes 8 to 11 and 13 to 16). Anti-HigA antibody was used at final dilutions of 1 in 5,000, 500, 50, and 5 for lanes 19 to 22, respectively.

    Journal: Journal of Bacteriology

    Article Title: Analyzing the Regulatory Role of the HigA Antitoxin within Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    doi: 10.1128/jb.00454-10

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIG. 5. Recombinant HigA protein directly and specifically binds to the higB P2 promoter. Protein-DNA binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein and the 68-bp 32P-labeled higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol) using increasing amounts of protein (A), unlabeled higB P2 promoter fragment (identical to the probe) as specific competitor (B), unlabeled higB P1 promoter fragment as nonspecific competitor (C), and anti-HigA antibody (D). The concentrations of recombinant protein used were 3.5, 7, 14, and 28 M for lanes 2 to 5, respectively, 0 M for lanes 1 and 17, and 56 M for all other lanes. Competitor DNA fragments were added in 5-, 10-, 100-, and 200-fold molar excess of the labeled probe (lanes 8 to 11 and 13 to 16). Anti-HigA antibody was used at final dilutions of 1 in 5,000, 500, 50, and 5 for lanes 19 to 22, respectively.

    Article Snippet: For competition or supershift assays, the appropriate amount of unlabeled competitor DNA or rabbit anti-HigA antibody (raised and purified by Cambridge Research Biochemicals Ltd. against a synthesized peptide equivalent to residues 112 to 129 of the HigA protein) was added to the reaction mixture.

    Techniques: Recombinant, Binding Assay, Labeling

    FIG. 6. Identification of the HigA DNA-binding motif and the effect of mutating this motif on HigA binding and higB P2 promoter activity. (A) The wild-type and mutated sequences of the 68-bp higB P2 promoter fragment. The experimentally determined P2 promoter transcriptional start site (45) and putative 10 and 35 sequences are in boldface and boxed, respectively. The identified perfect palindromic DNA motif is underlined, with mutated bases highlighted in gray. (B) DNA-binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein (0 and 56 M for lanes marked and , respectively) and the 32P-labeled mutated higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol). (C) Protein-DNA-binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein (56 M) and the 32P-labeled wild-type higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol) using increasing amounts of unlabeled mutated higB P2 promoter fragment as competitor (5-, 10-, 100-, and 200-fold molar excess of the labeled probe for lanes 2 to 5, respectively). (D) -Gal assays were performed on cell-free protein extracts of wild-type M. tuberculosis H37Rv and the higB-Rv1957 deletion strain containing the promoter-lacZ fusion plasmids pASF32 (wild-type higB P2 promoter) and pASF58 (mutated higB P2 promoter) alongside the empty vector control (pEJ414). The data presented are averages of the results for three biological replicates, each assayed in duplicate, and error bars represent standard deviations. The -Gal activity level for the higB-Rv1957 deletion strain containing pASF32 was significantly higher than the equivalent wild-type-strain level (, P 0.05; Student’s t test). The -Gal activity level for the higB-Rv1957 deletion strain containing pASF58 was not significantly different from the equivalent wild-type-strain level (P 0.05; Student’s t test).

    Journal: Journal of Bacteriology

    Article Title: Analyzing the Regulatory Role of the HigA Antitoxin within Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    doi: 10.1128/jb.00454-10

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIG. 6. Identification of the HigA DNA-binding motif and the effect of mutating this motif on HigA binding and higB P2 promoter activity. (A) The wild-type and mutated sequences of the 68-bp higB P2 promoter fragment. The experimentally determined P2 promoter transcriptional start site (45) and putative 10 and 35 sequences are in boldface and boxed, respectively. The identified perfect palindromic DNA motif is underlined, with mutated bases highlighted in gray. (B) DNA-binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein (0 and 56 M for lanes marked and , respectively) and the 32P-labeled mutated higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol). (C) Protein-DNA-binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein (56 M) and the 32P-labeled wild-type higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol) using increasing amounts of unlabeled mutated higB P2 promoter fragment as competitor (5-, 10-, 100-, and 200-fold molar excess of the labeled probe for lanes 2 to 5, respectively). (D) -Gal assays were performed on cell-free protein extracts of wild-type M. tuberculosis H37Rv and the higB-Rv1957 deletion strain containing the promoter-lacZ fusion plasmids pASF32 (wild-type higB P2 promoter) and pASF58 (mutated higB P2 promoter) alongside the empty vector control (pEJ414). The data presented are averages of the results for three biological replicates, each assayed in duplicate, and error bars represent standard deviations. The -Gal activity level for the higB-Rv1957 deletion strain containing pASF32 was significantly higher than the equivalent wild-type-strain level (, P 0.05; Student’s t test). The -Gal activity level for the higB-Rv1957 deletion strain containing pASF58 was not significantly different from the equivalent wild-type-strain level (P 0.05; Student’s t test).

    Article Snippet: For competition or supershift assays, the appropriate amount of unlabeled competitor DNA or rabbit anti-HigA antibody (raised and purified by Cambridge Research Biochemicals Ltd. against a synthesized peptide equivalent to residues 112 to 129 of the HigA protein) was added to the reaction mixture.

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Activity Assay, Labeling, Plasmid Preparation, Control

    FIG. 7. HigA does not bind to the next-most-closely related motif within the genome. (A) Sequence of the 68-bp fragment containing the DNA motif (underlined) between whiB5 and Rv0023, with the two bases mismatched to the HigA DNA-binding motif highlighted in gray. (B) Protein- DNA binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein (0 and 56 M for lanes marked and , respectively) and the 32P-labeled whiB5-Rv0023 probe (23 fmol). (C) Protein-DNA-binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein (56 M) and the 32P-labeled wild-type higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol) using increasing amounts of unlabeled whiB5-Rv0023 fragment as competitor (5-, 10-, 100-, and 200-fold molar excess of the labeled probe for lanes 2 to 5, respectively).

    Journal: Journal of Bacteriology

    Article Title: Analyzing the Regulatory Role of the HigA Antitoxin within Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    doi: 10.1128/jb.00454-10

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FIG. 7. HigA does not bind to the next-most-closely related motif within the genome. (A) Sequence of the 68-bp fragment containing the DNA motif (underlined) between whiB5 and Rv0023, with the two bases mismatched to the HigA DNA-binding motif highlighted in gray. (B) Protein- DNA binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein (0 and 56 M for lanes marked and , respectively) and the 32P-labeled whiB5-Rv0023 probe (23 fmol). (C) Protein-DNA-binding assays were performed between pure refolded HigA-His protein (56 M) and the 32P-labeled wild-type higB P2 promoter probe (23 fmol) using increasing amounts of unlabeled whiB5-Rv0023 fragment as competitor (5-, 10-, 100-, and 200-fold molar excess of the labeled probe for lanes 2 to 5, respectively).

    Article Snippet: For competition or supershift assays, the appropriate amount of unlabeled competitor DNA or rabbit anti-HigA antibody (raised and purified by Cambridge Research Biochemicals Ltd. against a synthesized peptide equivalent to residues 112 to 129 of the HigA protein) was added to the reaction mixture.

    Techniques: Sequencing, Binding Assay, Labeling